Furthermore, participants endowed with more roses have more of their offers accepted than their counterparts.
In an online dating experiment, participants can attach "virtual roses" to a proposal to signal special interest in another participant.
We find that attaching a rose to an offer substantially increases the chance of acceptance.
This effect is driven by an increase in the acceptance rate when the offer is made to a participant who is less desirable than the proposer.
A growing number of papers theoretically study the effects of introducing a preference signaling mechanism.
However, the empirical literature has had difficulty proving a basic tenet, namely that an agent has more success when the agent uses a signal.
This paper provides evidence based on a field experiment in an online dating market.
Participants are randomly endowed with two or eight “virtual roses” that a participant can use for free to signal special interest when asking for a date.
Our results show that, by sending a rose, a person can substantially increase the chance of the offer being accepted, and this positive effect is neither because the rose attracts attention from recipients nor because the rose is associated with unobserved quality.
Furthermore, we find evidence that roses increase the total number of dates, instead of crowding out offers without roses attached.
Despite the positive effect of sending roses, a substantial fraction of participants do not fully utilize their endowment of roses and even those who exhaust their endowment on average do not properly use their roses to maximize their dating success.
17340 Issued in August 2011 NBER Program(s): LS The large literature on costly signaling and the somewhat scant literature on preference signaling had varying success in showing the effectiveness of signals.